What this is
A coding assistant that knows nothing about you starts every conversation cold. You explain your setup, your preferences, your file layout — every time. The lightweight wall fixes this in one shot.
You paste a prompt into a coding assistant — not a chatbot, an agent with file access, like Claude Code or Codex CLI. It looks around your machine, asks you a few questions, and writes a short operator brief: who you are, how you work, where the important stuff lives. About a hundred and sixty lines of prose.
Every future assistant reads it first. The result feels like a new coworker who already read the manual.
The prompt
Copy this. Paste it into a coding assistant with file access. It does the rest.
That's it. Twenty lines when formatted. The agent inspects your machine, asks its questions, and builds the files. You review them, edit anything that's wrong, and you're done.
What it creates
HOW-I-WORK.md — your operating style, tools, workflows, preferences
MACHINE-MAP.md — where things live, mounts, remote machines, friction points
STEWARDSHIP.md — how to refresh it, what to check, sanitization rules
WORKLOG.md — what was done, when, by which assistant
The stewardship file is what makes it last. Without it, the files rot — they describe a version of you that no longer exists. The stewardship notes tell future assistants how to keep the brief current.
What it does not include
The prompt explicitly forbids: PII, secrets, raw personal filenames, document titles, email addresses, IPs, account IDs, and document contents. The brief describes how you work, not what you're working on. It separates fact from inference and marks guesses as "unclear."
This is not a data collection project. No exports, no databases, no disk encryption warnings. It's a text file and a folder that an octopus can read.
How we tested it
Six runs. Deleted everything between runs. Fresh agent each time. Scored on a 20-point rubric: discoverability, artifact shape, how-I-work quality, machine-map quality, sanitization, fact vs inference, steering integration, stewardship, worklog, and skills.
- Best run scored 13 out of 20. Created four clean files. Mapped the machine accurately. Found external drives, remote boxes, session state. Marked guesses as inferred. Didn't leak a single secret.
- Common weaknesses: saving to the wrong directory (~/work/me instead of ~/me), stating inferences as facts, missing the worklog, creating markdown notes instead of real skill artifacts.
- The rubric is in the book. The test is repeatable. Run it on your own machine and see what score you get.
What happens after
You'll know it worked the first time an assistant does something useful without you explaining yourself. Sets up a project the way you like. Knows where your photos are. Knows you keep data separate from code. "Oh. It already knows."
The lightweight wall gets you eighty percent of the value for one percent of the cost. Most people only need this. If you want the other twenty percent — every email, every photo, every conversation you've ever had, searchable and queryable — that's the full wall of data.
- The Folder Is the Interface — why ~/me works: agents read your folder structure as their first prompt
- Memory Is Files — the most sophisticated memory system is a person writing things down in a text file
- The Steering File — the pointer files that tell assistants where to look
- Your Data Is Already Yours — why you own all of this and always have
- Wall of Data — the full data collection project (if you want the other twenty percent)
- Vic and Sam: "The File That Knows You" — the episode where Vic tries this prompt and explains the octopus metaphor